Those workers who die, in 2017, with an estate worth more than $5.49 million will rest in peace.
Or, might it be more likely to benefit Donald Trump’s family?
Those workers who die, in 2017, with an estate worth more than $5.49 million will rest in peace.
Or, might it be more likely to benefit Donald Trump’s family?
…
According to [Alan] Garten [a lawyer for the Trump Organization], Trump played a passive role in the development of the property: he was “merely a licensor” who allowed his famous name to be used by a company headed by Ziya Mammadov’s son, Anar, a young entrepreneur. It’s not clear how much money Trump made from the licensing agreement, although in his limited public filings he has reported receiving $2.8 million. (The Trump Organization shared documents that showed an additional payment of two and a half million dollars, in 2012, but declined to disclose any other payments.) Trump also had signed a contract to manage the hotel once it opened, for an undisclosed fee tied to the hotel’s performance. The Washington Post published Garten’s description of the deal, and reported that Donald Trump had “invested virtually no money in the project while selling the rights to use his name and holding the contract to manage the property.”
These are two of Donald Trump’s many comments following the August 2013 Sarin attack by Bashar al-Assad which killed more than ten times the number of people than the most recent.
Deputy assistant to President Donald Trump, Sebastian Gorka, said Friday that, “Trump’s past tweets arguing against military action in Syria shouldn’t be held against him because Trump wasn’t president then.”
Donald Trump must not be allowed to weasel his way out of these comments by backroom writers and administration staff “clarifying” his comments and tweets. He said it over and over again; clearly he meant it. And, in the 2013 Sarin attack more than ten times the number of people died.
In October 2012, Trump suggested a military strike in the Middle East would boost Obama’s approval ratings.
Hillary Clinton “wants to start a shooting war in Syria… that could very well lead to World War III,” Trump said in Florida days before Election Day, 2016.
Vladimir Putin takes that famous quote and elevates it to a whole new level. He has been in power since 1999 (He was Prime Minister from 1999 to 2000 becoming Acting President on 31 December 1999, when Yeltsin resigned). The term limit was, at the time, two consecutive terms of four years. However, in 2008, Medvedev was installed as a puppet president while Putin yielded all power through the office of Prime Minister. One of the first acts, “by Medvedev”, was to increase the term limit to two consecutive terms of six years to begin at the end of his presidency. In 2012, Putin regained the presidency this time for his second tenure, first term, of six years. He is due for re-election in 2018—can there be any doubt as to the result of that election which will put Putin in power again until 2024?
What would you call a politician who has remained in power for eighteen years, so far, despite an original term limit of eight years—a dictator, perhaps?